septiembre 17, 2008

Livni wins Kadima primary by narrow margin


Livni wins Kadima primary by narrow margin


By Haaretz Staff and News Agencies


Despite the landslide victory attributed to Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni in the exit polls by Israel's three major TV stations, Livni beat her main rival Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz in Wednesday's Kadima primary by only 500 votes, a difference of only two percent. Voter turnout in the primary stood at 55 percent. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Wednesday evening phoned Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and congratulated her on her victory in the party primary after TV exit polls indicated she had won by a landslide.
Advertisement
Olmert wished Livni good luck and told her she would receive his full cooperation in passing on the role of leadership in the event she is capable of establishing a coalition. The two planned to meet later this week. Exit polls by Israel's three major TV stations put Livni on 47-49 percent of the vote in the election for the new Kadima leader, negating a second round of voting to replace Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and making her the next likely premier.



A Nuclear Awakening in the Middle East


A Nuclear Awakening in the Middle East


By CLAUDE SALHANI (Editor, Middle East Times )

Published: September 16, 2008


GENEVA -- Nuclear power and the Middle East is not all that much of a novelty; in fact long before Iraq, Iran and lately Syria toyed with the notion of acquiring nuclear technology for civilian use (if you believe the Syrians and the Iranians), or for military purposes (if you believe the cynics). Long before them, Egypt hoped to join the exclusive club of which to date, Pakistan remains the only Muslim country to have nuclear weapons.
Yet, as early as in the mid-1960s Egyptian President
Gamal Abdel Nasser displayed a keen interest in obtaining nuclear technology. And the Egyptians under Nasser probably would have acquired the know-how and the facilities, and possibly the bomb; had it not been for the Six-Day War.

The June 5, 1967 Arab-Israeli conflict changed the map of the Middle East, literally, as the State of Israel, at that time still in its teens, more than doubled its size. Israel captured the Sinai Peninsula and the Gaza Strip from the Egyptians; the West Bank and East Jerusalem from the Jordanians; and the Golan Plateau from the Syrians. The war also put a damper on any sales of nuclear technology to the Arabs -- be it for civilian or military use, lest they be tempted to use those weapons against Israel in the next conflict, which there certainly was going to be more than one.


Jordan, Kuwait renew support for PA


Jordan, Kuwait renew support for PA


AMMAN (JT) - Jordan and Kuwait on Tuesday renewed their support for the Palestinian Authority’s efforts to unify the Palestinian ranks.
During talks in Kuwait City between His Majesty King Abdullah and Kuwaiti Emir Sheikh Sabah Al Ahmad Al Sabah, the two leaders said the current Palestinian rift threatens the interests of the Palestinian people and its aspirations to establish an independent state in the West Bank and Gaza.
They also called for intensifying efforts to alleviate the suffering of the Palestinians as a result of the harsh economic conditions they are experiencing.
The King and Sheikh Sabah stressed their eagerness to improve ties and take them to the highest levels possible in all fields.
The two leaders also discussed ways to bolster joint Arab action so that the Arab nation would aptly stand up to the challenges it is facing.
They discussed the situation in Lebanon and Iraq, voicing support for all efforts to achieve security, stability and unity.
His Majesty is due to travel to China today for a two-day visit, during which he will hold talks with Chinese President Hu Jintao on means to bolster bilateral ties and build strategic relations in different fields.


One of the trickiest jobs in the world


One of the trickiest jobs in the world


Sep 11th 2008 JERUSALEM

From The Economist print edition
Israelis face the daunting prospect of a drawn-out search for a new leader, and not just of their current ruling party


IN THE eyes of more hopeful Israelis, the election on September 17th for a new leader of Kadima, the party that runs the country’s governing coalition, should mark the end of a sordid period of Israeli politics and the start of a bright new era under a fresh-faced, peace-seeking female prime minister. But that is not how things tend to happen. Kadima’s leadership election date may just be the start of a lengthy haggle—and the uncertainty may not even end until after a general election, perhaps in the spring of next year.
Tzipi Livni, Israel’s foreign minister, who is favourite to win the primary, may replace Ehud Olmert, the present prime minister, who is mired in corruption charges, as head of the party. But it may then take weeks to rebuild a workable ruling coalition. If her more conservative rival to lead Kadima, Shaul Mofaz, wins, he would face weeks of haggling too. Worse yet, for those who are impatient to push ahead with the current stuttering negotiations for peace with the Palestinians, the Kadima primary could set off months of edginess, failure to produce an effective coalition, a general election early in 2009 and a possible Israeli lurch to the hard right.


septiembre 11, 2008

Seven ways Israel could haunt the 2008 campaign


Seven ways Israel could haunt the 2008 campaign

By
Bradley Burston

10 September 2008
Something big has happened to the Israel issue in the 2008 presidential race. It has disappeared. John McCain and Sarah Palin, who in key states like Florida may have the most to gain from an unabashedly pro-Israel stance, made no mention of the Jewish state in their centerpiece acceptance speeches last week. Neither did Joe Biden, who was to have shored Barack Obama's pro-Israel credentials with undecided Jewish voters. Of the four, only Obama mentioned Israel in his acceptance address - only once, and, significantly, the focus of the reference was on Tehran. "You don't protect Israel and deter Iran just by talking tough in Washington." Does this mean that the U.S. Jewish vote no longer counts? Not at all. There are still at least
seven key states, rich in electoral votes, in which Jewish voters could put McCain or Obama over the top. While the Jewish vote has not diminished in potential importance, research suggests that Israel figures little in the bedrock concerns of Jewish voters. In a wide-ranging poll conducted late last year, the American Jewish Committee asked a representative cross-section of U.S. Jews to choose the campaign issue most important to them. A total of 23 percent of the respondents chose the economy and jobs. Health care was second, with 19 percent. Another 16 percent said the war in Iraq was the most important issue, with 14 percent choosing terrorism and national security.


septiembre 08, 2008

Statements to the press by FM Livni and Secy Rice


Statements to the press by FM Livni and Secy Rice


Statements to the press by Vice Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Tzipi Livni and US Secretary of State Condoleezza RiceJerusalem
FOREIGN MINISTER LIVNI: Good morning, everybody. I would like to welcome Secretary Rice to the region, to Jerusalem. We are going to discuss today, of course, regional issues, but especially the Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. We are going to have a trilateral meeting today with my co-partner, with Abu Ala and the Palestinian team, according to Annapolis, in order to continue and to find a way to reach an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. Even in these hectic days, we continue to negotiate. There are meetings between Abu Ala and myself, there are meetings between different teams on different issues, and we are going to continue to do so. Thank you.
SECRETARY RICE: Thank you very much. I have very little to add to that. I look forward to our discussions. The trilaterals are always helpful, to give me a better sense of how the parties are proceeding, and to see if there is anything more that the United States, or in fact, the international community can do to help the parties reach their objective. And so, I look forward to our discussions.
Q: The organization Peace Now reported today that Israeli settlement activity has nearly doubled in the past year. Foreign Minister Livni, how do you reconcile that with your stated goal of trying to reach a peace agreement?And, Secretary Rice, what effect does this have? Does this harm or undermine the process?
FOREIGN MINISTER LIVNI: The peace process is not and should not be affected by any kind of settlement activities. At the end of the day, we are talking about the future borders of the Palestinian state. For more than 40 years we have been talking more or less about the same settlement blocs, and this is part of the negotiations. I understand that this sometimes does affect different parts of Palestinian society. But at the end of the day, as I suggested also to my co-partners on the Palestinian side, the role of leaders is to try and find a way to live in peace in the future, and not to let any kind of "noise" that relate to the situation on the ground to enter the negotiating room. It could also have been easier also for me to use some excuses, and to say that certain events affect my ability to negotiate. But I decided not to do so, even in harder days of terror. So I would like to suggest my co-partners not to use it as an excuse. I know that they are not using it as an excuse, but I understand the frustration sometimes.
At the end of the day, the Israeli government policy is not to expand settlements, it is not to build new settlements, not to confiscate land from Palestinians. And, according to my knowledge, settlement activities have been reduced in the most dramatic way, especially in areas which are on the other side of the security fence. There were some small activities that are not going to influence the future borders of the Palestinian state.
SECRETARY RICE: Well, let me start there, which is that it's the position of the United States that the parties should not take steps that somehow would prejudice the final status outcome. And, in fact, the borders of the Palestinian state and Israel will be determined by agreement.
I think it's no secret, and I've said it to my Israeli counterparts, that I don't think the settlement activity is helpful to the process, that in fact, what we need now are steps that enhance confidence between the parties. And anything that undermines confidence between the parties ought to be avoided. So, we will continue to press ahead to get agreement, so that we know what is in Israel and what is in Palestine. That is ultimately the goal. But certainly the activity is not helpful.
Q: Madame Secretary, we are hearing that the gaps between the two sides, Israeli and Palestinian, are still wide. Do you see that, by the end of the year, some kind of agreement can be reached?
SECRETARY RICE: I will start on the question of the gaps between the sides. First of all, I am very heartened by the fact that the negotiations are serious, and they are intensive. And, in fact, I believe that the parties have succeeded in moving their understandings of what needs to be achieved. And, indeed, they’re positioned somewhat closer together over this period of time. We are certainly not anywhere near the point that we were a year ago, when we didn't even have an active process for the addressing of gaps.
It's not surprising to anybody that there are still difficult issues to come to agreement on, that there are still gaps. After all, this is a conflict that goes back at least 40 years, if not much longer than that. And so, the ability to resolve this and to get it done, there have been many attempts. But I have to say that I think they are making a very serious attempt. And part of the reason that I am here is to help to point out places where those - not from an American point of view, but from listening to the parties - on where I hear points of convergence. And I think it has been useful for the parties to hear that.
FOREIGN MINISTER LIVNI: I would like to add something on this, if I might. We need to remember, Secretary Rice referred to the conflict, which is more than 40 years old. But we need to also remind ourselves where we stood only a year ago, when we faced terror attacks, when the situation in the Gaza Strip led to a kind of an understanding that there was no hope for peace.
We launched the Annapolis process. There is now a dialogue between Israel and diplomatic leaders on the Palestinian side. There is hope for peace, which can represent the interests of both sides. This is no less important. I think that sometimes there is a need to remind ourselves that we changed the atmosphere, the situation on the ground.
SECRETARY RICE: Of course, the goals of Annapolis remain. And we are working on a process, and that is the important point.